An eHarmony lawsuit against its matching technology was filed in California in 2007. The company settled with the City of Santa Monica and the District Attorneys for the State of California after being sued by a gay man. The suit stated that the company violated consumer protection laws and the state’s Restore Online Shoppers Confidence Act by failing to provide same-sex couples a separate site. But the plaintiffs aren’t going away. The case has now been resolved, and eHarmony will have to pay close to $1.5 million in legal fees to the states involved.
- 1 The lawsuit alleges that eHarmony duped users.
- 1.1 The eHarmony lawsuit was filed after the online dating website refused to refund users who had canceled their subscriptions.
- 1.2 A $2.2 million lawsuit against eHarmony alleges that the company misled users by not disclosing terms of the auto-renewal of memberships.
- 1.3 The lawsuit claims that the dating site acted unfairly by denying gays the opportunity to find their soulmates.
The lawsuit alleges that eHarmony duped users.
The company won a $2.2 million settlement in a California class-action suit where a user won the right to cancel his account within three days. Other users claim that they did not receive refunds when their accounts were auto-renewed, which they say was illegal. eHarmony also denies refunds unless they are legally required to do so. In addition to the settlement, there are thousands of complaints filed online and on consumer rating sites.
Despite the recent settlement, eHarmony is still facing several legal challenges. For one, the dating website did not clearly explain the terms and conditions of its membership plans. There was no clear dating contract or cancellation policy. Similarly, eHarmony failed to give proper notices to customers who signed up for a service. According to the complaint, the company did not provide enough information on the terms and conditions of its services. Ultimately, the lawsuit was dismissed in favor of the consumers.
The eHarmony lawsuit was filed after the online dating website refused to refund users who had canceled their subscriptions.
The plaintiffs claimed that the company misrepresented the terms of their memberships. This led to confusion and broke state laws. The plaintiffs sought the court’s intervention in the case, which was filed in November. A class-action lawsuit filed against eHarmony has been settled in Texas and surrounding states. The case centered on a lawsuit against eHarmony for auto-renewal fees and other alleged damages.
The eHarmony lawsuit was filed in 2005. The New Jersey attorney general’s office concluded that the online dating website was discriminatory against gays. The suit was also about eHarmony’s hesitation to associate itself publicly with the gay community. The settlement in the case was a significant victory for the eHarmony team. It is a significant win for the consumer. However, the company faces several other issues related to the way the service is operated.
A $2.2 million lawsuit against eHarmony alleges that the company misled users by not disclosing terms of the auto-renewal of memberships.
As a result of the settlement, eHarmony has resolved the lawsuit and is continuing to provide Compatible Partners with a range of options for a satisfying life. Its lawyers believe that the case will continue to be settled and the eHarmony website may no longer be a profitable business.
eHarmony was also sued by California consumers for not providing refunds. In the California lawsuit, the plaintiffs sought a $2.2 million refund for their auto-renewal subscriptions. Despite the settlement, many eHarmony users still feel that the dating service has been unjust to them. They have even filed for damages for breach of contract. While it is not surprising that California has ruled against eHarmony, the eHarmony consumer claims have shown that eHarmony is a victim of unfair business practices.
The lawsuit claims that the dating site acted unfairly by denying gays the opportunity to find their soulmates.
The lawsuit was filed by Linda Carlson in California in a class action suit against eHarmony, Inc., in response to complaints that it had a problem with discrimination, which she said had to do with its faulty auto-renewal policies. The plaintiffs argued that eHarmony violated the rights of gays by failing to provide a refund policy.
In the California lawsuit against eHarmony, the dating service was sued by gay members who claimed the company had misrepresented the terms of its auto-renewal policies. As a result of the settlement, eHarmony has agreed to pay $2.2 million to settle the claims. This settlement will allow gay consumers to receive a full refund if their memberships are canceled before their expiration dates. Further, if eHarmony fails to comply with its obligations, the eHarmony user can seek additional damages.